Campo v. Electro-Coal Transfer Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
970 F.2d 51 · 1992
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2011
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 46 U.S.C. § 30104 (Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (Jones Act))
Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Morrison v. Olson · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co. · Tisdale v. United States · Offshore Company and the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Appellants v. Johnie M. Robison, Appellee-Appellant. Robison v. Offshore Company and the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'We reject the notion that [a] fleet of vessels in this context means any group of vessels an employee happens to work aboard.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.