Thompson v. Dulaney’s Empirical Analysis
970 F.2d 744 · 1992
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Forsyth v. Barr (1994), Williams v. Poulos (1993)
13 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co. · Applied Genetics International, Inc. v. First Affiliated Securities, Inc. · Demarest v. Manspeaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) [that] the information used or disclosed came from an intercepted communication, and 2) sufficient facts concerning the circumstances of the interception such that the defendant[s] could, with presumed knowledge of the law, determine that the interception was prohibited in light of Title III [or Ohio law].”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires that interceptions be intentional before liability attaches, thereby excluding inadvertent interceptions.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— (a) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; (b) intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication____; (c) intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the eon-tents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection; or (d)intentionally uses, or endeavors to use, the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection; shall be punished as provided in subsection (4) or shall be subject to suit as provided in subsection (5). 4”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.