United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
970 F.2d 907 · 1992
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably United States v. Portela (1999), United States v. Wilson (1998)
31 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2315 · 18 U.S.C. § 3584 · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Chambers v. Mississippi · Huddleston v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Taylor v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the district court's Rule 403 determinations 'with great deference, reversing only for "grave abuse”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an important factor but not a prerequisite to exclusion,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We think any requirement of bad faith as an absolute condition to exclusion would be inconsistent with the Taylor Court’s reference to trial court discretion and its extended discussion of the relevant factors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.