970 F. Supp. 2d 317 - Irish v. Ferguson’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
4 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · United States v. Turkette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A Schedule K-1 is a tax form used to report a taxpayer's portion of a corporation's income or loss which passes to the taxpayer as a shareholder of the corporation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the challenged action has had an actual adverse effect on competition as a whole in the relevant market,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The antitrust laws ... were enacted for 'the protection of competition , not competitors .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.