Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 970 P.2d 925 - Dutton v. State

Dutton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2024

10 state decisions

401999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn · United States v. Scott · United States v. Broce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “criminal defendants may relinquish their double jeopardy rights by their conduct . . . even though no judicial officer ever explains the double jeopardy consequences of his conduct beforehand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the Double Jeopardy Clause does not relieve [a defendant] from the consequences of [the] choice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.