People v. Shock’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2018
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Townshend · People v. Rishel · People v. Odom · People v. Holmes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[plrior caselaw would sustain either a long period of suspension or disbarment in this case. However, '[gliven the abbreviated record in these default proceedings, and the facts and circumstances of this particular case, we elect to follow the ree-ommendations of the hearing panel and impose a period of suspension rather than disbarment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Demaray“problematical whether a period of suspension, rather than disbarment, is adequate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Carrigan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.