Cliatt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 531 So. 2d 956 - Blackshear v. State · 920 So. 2d 735 - Carter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the trial court did not exercise its discretion to impose life imprisonment, it could not impose a sentence in which the total of the incarcerative term and the probationary term exceeded the maximum sentence for a particular offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Champagne v. State“is the minimum sentence that may be imposed by the trial court, absent a valid reason for departure,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Champagne v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.