Ratliff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Combs v. State · 899 So. 2d 447 - Garcia v. State · J.F. v. State · 962 So. 2d 394 - Johnson v. State · Kaduk v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hile hearsay evidence is admissible in probation revocation proceedings, probation cannot be revoked based solely on hearsay evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. YERRICK v. State“[t]he state has the burden of proving by the greater weight of the evidence that a violation of probation is willful and substantial”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. YERRICK v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.