United States v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
971 F.2d 1189 · 1992
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Carroll (1994), United States v. Frost (1997)
63 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante · Oregon v. Mathiason · California v. Beheler · Minnesota v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant is not entitled to severance because the proof is greater against a co-defendant.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The verdict of a jury must be sustained if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“defendants bear the burden of making a strong showing of factually specific and compelling prejudice resulting from a joint trial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.