Galindo v. Ylst’s Empirical Analysis
971 F.2d 1427 · 1992
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Brady v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante · Estelle v. McGuire · Vandygriff v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]o preserve an objection to a trial court's ruling that a prior felony conviction could be admitted, a defendant must actually testify at trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a federal court's preliminary ruling on a question not reaching constitutional dimensions such as a decision [regarding impeachment by prior convictions] under Rule 609(a)is reviewable on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.