Rhoa-Zamora v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Juresma-Altamirano’s Empirical Analysis
971 F.2d 26 · 1992
Citation profile
69 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Lin Zhong v. United States Department of Justice (2006), Abdulai v. Ashcroft (2001)
69 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Foy v. Northeast Suburban Life
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'alien has not exhausted the administrative remedies available to him as of right,'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“will not weigh evidence that the Board has not previously considered,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the mechanism of the motion to reopen, which allows asylum petitioners an opportunity to introduce evidence rebutting officially noticed facts”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.