Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 971 F.2d 5 - Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Express Freight Lines Incorporated a Jansen

Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Express Freight Lines Incorporated a Jansen’s Empirical Analysis

971 F.2d 5 · 1992

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ruggiero (1993), People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205 (1997)

11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1301992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ryan · 26 1673 74636 James Wilson Associates Metropolitan Life Insurance Company · King v. Ionization International, Inc. · Eh Reise v. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System · Powers v. Chicago Transit Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judgment entered pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 ends the proceeding to determine liability and relief, but it begins the collection proceeding if the defendant refuses to pay. A contested collection proceeding will end in a judgment or a series of judgments granting supplementary relief to the plaintiff. The judgment that concludes the collection proceeding is the judgment from which the defendant can appeal.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] postjudgment order might seem final by definition because the judgment is already behind it,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if desperate for an immediate appeal, can disobey the order and appeal the resulting judgment for criminal contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.