United States v. Staples’s Empirical Analysis
971 F.2d 608 · 1992
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)
Relies on Morissette v. United States · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Griffin v. United States · Liparota v. United States · United States v. Freed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Government need not prove the defendant knows he’s dealing with a weapon possessing every last characteristic [which subjects it] 2 to the regulation. It would be enough to prove he knows that he is dealing with a dangerous device of a type as would alert one to the likelihood of regulation.” Tr. 465.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the registration requirements of the National Firearms Act were passed pursuant to the taxing power”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]s a result of section 922(o), compliance with section 5861 is impossible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.