Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 971 F.2d 608 - United States v. Staples

United States v. Staples’s Empirical Analysis

971 F.2d 608 · 1992

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Morissette v. United States · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Griffin v. United States · Liparota v. United States · United States v. Freed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Government need not prove the defendant knows he’s dealing with a weapon possessing every last characteristic [which subjects it] 2 to the regulation. It would be enough to prove he knows that he is dealing with a dangerous device of a type as would alert one to the likelihood of regulation.” Tr. 465.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the registration requirements of the National Firearms Act were passed pursuant to the taxing power”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]s a result of section 922(o), compliance with section 5861 is impossible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.