Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 971 F.2d 620 - United States v. Elliott

United States v. Elliott’s Empirical Analysis

971 F.2d 620 · 1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2017

7 federal appellate ·

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morton v. Mancari · Bibby v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] sentence of zero months does not literally violate the prohibition on probation in 18 U.S.C. § 3561 (a)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.