United States v. Paslay’s Empirical Analysis
971 F.2d 667 · 1992
Citation profile
30 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably United States v. Garrison (1998), United States v. Mullens (1995)
30 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Hormel v. Helvering · Brewster v. Derwinski · United States v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Burns notice will be subject to waiver and limited review under the plain error rule when a defendant fails to make a timely objection predicated on Burns.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“setting forth the potential ground (or grounds) for the upward departure within a 'reasonable' amount of time prior to the sentencing hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Burns requires that pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 32, criminal defendants be provided notice prior to the sentencing hearing of the specific grounds for any upward departure that a sentencing court is considering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.