Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 971 F.2d 876 - United States v. Rivera

United States v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis

971 F.2d 876 · 1992

Citation profile

240
cited by 240 later decisions
6
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

162 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 240 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Jacobson (1994), United States v. Locascio (1993)

162 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions

16801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3013 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7201

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Young · Darden v. Wainwright · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 240 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice during the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f the defendant establishes that (1) he is not able and, even with the use of a reasonable installment schedule, is not likely to become able to pay all or part of the fine....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “evidence [is] viewed in the light most favorable to the government and all permissible inferences [are] drawn in its favor,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.