Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 971 F. Supp. 1337 - Upper Deck Authenticated, Ltd. v. CPG DIRECT

971 F. Supp. 1337 - Upper Deck Authenticated, Ltd. v. CPG DIRECT’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Carnegie v. United States · Delaware v. New York · Sanders Confectionery Products Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Resale by the first purchaser of the original article under the producer's trademark is neither trademark infringement nor unfair competition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.