971 F. Supp. 2d 1050 - Driskell v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Haines v. Kerner · Younger v. Harris · Thomas v. Arn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e recently decided that Rooker-Feldman did not apply to determinations in Colorado Rule 120 proceedings, at least insofar as preventing a foreclosure sale where proceedings are pending.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the more appropriate remedy is to pursue an independent action in state court that challenges the [state court's] order authorizing foreclosure and the sale of the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]n Order Authorizing Sale has issued in the Rule 120 proceeding; thus, the Rule 120 proceeding cannot serve as a basis for Younger abstention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.