Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 971 FSUPP2D 847 - Taylor v. Biglari

Taylor v. Biglari’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Aronson v. Lewis · Brehm v. Eisner · Weinberger v. UOP, Inc. · Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc. · Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f a plaintiff has already been subjected to the putative harm caused by the defendants' conduct for a significant period of time, he or she cannot credibly argue that pressing hardship requires injunctive relief in the interim before the underlying matter is resolved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.