Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 971 P2D 17 - Dumas v. Gagner

Dumas v. Gagner’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. McCormack · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · 80 Wash. 2d 547 - Sorenson v. City of Bellingham · 96 Wash. 2d 215 - State v. Williams · Kirk v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough Respondent’s petition did not cite specific subsections of the [election contest] statute, sufficient facts and law were stated concerning the nature of the claim to bring the petition under the statute. Although the petition is not a model of pleading, it is nevertheless adequate so long as it is sufficient to satisfy necessary legal requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “of the general nature of the claim asserted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.