Nelson v. Elway’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2025
3 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harding Glass Co. v. Jones · Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. Mulei · Nelson v. Elway · Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. District Court in & for Weld County · Van Osdol v. Vogt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“COCCA”) claims after the court of appeals had remanded the case for the explicit purpose of holding further proceedings on other COCCA claims. Id. at 77-78 . Because the COCCA claims at issue had been excluded by the trial court in error, allowing amendment to reincorporate them was appropriate. Id. at 78 . We also determined that a breach of fiduciary duty claim could be added subsequent to remand because it was not expressly or impliedly precluded by the appellate court's mandate. Id. at 78-79 . . C.R.C.P. 54(b) provides that when more than one claim for relief is presented in an action,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Because of [the trial court's] erroneous conclusion, the trial court did not exercise its discretion in passing upon Nelson's motion to amend; it held, in essence, that the supreme court's prior opinion foreclosed it from exercising that discretion. Consequently, its ruling cannot stand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. DeBELLA v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.