971 So. 2d 166 - Snyder v. McLeod’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 554 So. 2d 499 - Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais · Wendt v. Horowitz · 739 So. 2d 617 - Woods v. Nova Companies Belize Ltd. · 828 So. 2d 1071 - American Financial Trading Corp. v. Bauer · HILLTOPPER HOLDING v. Estate of Cutchin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) A defendant who is engaged in substantial and not isolated activity within this state, whether such activity is wholly interstate, intrastate, or otherwise, is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the state, whether or not the claim arises from that activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.