Campbell v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 749 So. 2d 490 - Brown v. Estate of Stuckey · 159 So. 2d 641 - Shaw v. Puleo · 614 So. 2d 495 - Easkold v. Rhodes · Holmes v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. · 660 So. 2d 1061 - STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS. CO. v. Orr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here 'the evidence is undisputed or substantially undisputed that a plaintiff has experienced and will experience pain and suffering as a result of an accident, a zero award for pain and suffering is inadequate as a matter of law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The appropriate standard of review applied to a trial court’s denial of a motion for a new trial is whether the trial court abused its discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where there is conflicting evidence, the weight to be given that evidence is within the province of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.