Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

971 So. 2d 271

Docket No. 1D06-6449.

Johns v. State

Darnell JOHNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 7, 2008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-01-07

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2016

4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“never be a forcible felony, and so will not support a[PRR] sentence”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Davis v. State

Relies on 961 So. 2d 211 - State v. Hearns · 967 So. 2d 376 - Spradlin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-01-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*272 Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3BROWNING, C.J.

¶4Darnell Johns appeals his conviction of felony battery and corresponding sentence of five years of incarceration as a prison releasee reoffender. We affirm the conviction without further discussion; however, we reverse the sentence, and remand for removal of the prison releasee reoffender designation.

¶5The State concedes that the prison releasee reoffender designation was improper because the conviction was under section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes (2006), which reclassifies a simple battery as a felony battery because of a prior battery conviction. The Florida Supreme Court has recently held that a conviction for battery on a law enforcement officer will not support sentencing enhancement as a violent career criminal because it can never be a forcible felony. See State v. Hearns,961 So.2d 211, 219 (Fla.2007). In doing so, it noted that battery on a law enforcement officer is just simple battery reclassified merely because of the victim's status, and that the question of whether battery on a law enforcement officer qualifies for either a violent career criminal or a prison releasee reoffender designation must be answered consistently. Id. at 217, 219. Analogously, the instant conviction was of simple battery reclassified merely because of the offender's prior battery conviction; thus, it also can never be a forcible felony, and so will not support a prison releasee reoffender (or a violent career criminal) sentence. See Spradlin v. State,967 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

¶6AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for resentencing.

¶7KAHN and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

/971/so2d/271 · .json · Public domain