971 So. 2d 31 - Salter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Allen v. Wright · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Sierra Club v. Morton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`the proven danger of recidivism by criminal sex offenders,'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Kew v. Twe · San v. Sen““In Lee v. State, 895 So.2d 1038 (Ala.Crim.App.2004), this Court, relying on Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 , 123 S.Ct. 1140 , 155 L.Ed.2d 164 (2003), concluded that the CNA was not an ex post facto law, either facially or as applied to the appellant in that case, who was an adult criminal sex offender. This Court held that the CNA was intended to create a civil regulatory scheme and that it did not have any punitive effect on the appellant that would negate the legislative intent of the act. 895 So.2d at 1042-43 . See Boyd v. State, 960 So.2d 717 (Ala.Crim.App.2006). See also Salter v. State, 971 So.2d 31 (Ala.Civ.App.2007).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.