¶1ORDER
¶2Defendant Anthony Eanes appeals a judgment entered after a jury trial convicting him of kidnapping, Section 565.110, RSMo 1993,
¶3Regarding the direct appeal, we have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
¶4No issue pertaining to Defendant’s post-conviction appeal has been briefed. That appeal has thus been abandoned, and is denied. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
¶5Judgments affirmed.
¶6. All further statutory references are to Missouri Revised Statutes 1993 unless otherwise noted.