State v. DeOliveira’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schmerber v. State of California · Moran v. Burbine · Oregon v. Elstad · Missouri v. Seibert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[The trial justice] must determine whether the verdict is against the fair preponderance of the evidence and fails to do substantial justice. If the verdict meets this standard, then a new trial may be granted. However, the motion will be denied if the trial justice determines that the evidence and the reasonable inferences drawn therefrom are so nearly balanced that reasonable individuals could differ.” Id. 12”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Adefusika“in the best position to assess the relative credibility of witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barros
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.