972 F2d 1340 Mackenzie v. Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of the State of Washington
972 F.2d 1340
George A. MACKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OF THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON, et al.; Sharon Stewart Johnson, et
al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 90-35648, 91-35364, 91-35580.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 27, 1992.
Decided Aug. 3, 1992.
As Amended Feb. 19, 1993.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
The district court, like every other court or administrator reviewing Mackenzie's allegations, has afforded him an extensive opportunity to present his evidence and arguments. It carefully acknowledged each point in his response to its order to show cause. We agree that summary judgment is appropriate. Appellees' motion to supplement the record is denied as moot. The order granting summary judgment to defendants is AFFIRMED.