Maula v. Freckleton’s Empirical Analysis
972 F.2d 27 · 1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2012
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Estelle v. McGuire · Oregon v. Kennedy · United States v. Scott · United States v. Dinitz · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the termination of his first trial before the verdict. Although the government argues that Williams failed to preserve this claim, we need not reach the preservation issue because the district court did not abuse its discretion when it found that the jury was deadlocked. 65 When a defendant fails to consent to a trial court's declaration of a mistrial, double jeopardy will bar a second prosecution unless there was a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.