Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 972 F.2d 318 - Moore v. Zant

Moore v. Zant’s Empirical Analysis

972 F.2d 318 · 1992

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably State v. Chambers (1995), Foster v. Al Lockhart a Foster (1993)

16 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

130199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Barker v. Wingo · Giglio v. United States · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ordered that ‘petitioner within 180 days after this order becomes final by failure to appeal or by mandate of the circuit court of appeals shall be afforded a new sentencing phase trial, failing which upon motion a writ of habeas corpus discharging him from custody shall issue.’” Moore v. Zant, 972 F.2d 318 , 319 (11th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (citation omitted). In that case, the State argued that the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not usually adjudicate the constitutionality of future state acts directed at the petitioner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[S]peedy trial rights cannot be adjudicated prospectively or in the abstract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.