Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

972 F.2d 340

Docket No. 92-6302.

Charles H. Holloway v. John H. Painter Bobby Haulk J. A. Rogers

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 11, 1992 Decided: August 7, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-07

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re: Isiah James, II

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-07

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles H. Holloway, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Charles H. Holloway appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holloway v. Painter, No. CA-92-49-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/972/f2d/340 · .json · Public domain