Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

972 F.2d 342

Docket No. 92-6205.

Frizell Stephens v. Raymond M. Muncy, Warden

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 3, 1992 Decided: August 10, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-10

Relies on Sulfridge v. Lumber Company

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-10

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-89-547-N)

Frizell Stephens, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Frizell Stephens appeals from the district court's order denying his Motion for Relief of Order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stephens v. Muncy, No. CA-89-547-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/972/f2d/342 · .json · Public domain