Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

972 F.2d 353

Docket No. 91-3582EM.

Clark v. Armontrout

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: August 3, 1992. Filed: August 24, 1992.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-24

Relies on Abernathy v. Missouri Pacific R.R.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-24

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Eric Preston Clark appeals the district court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's report rejecting the grounds for relief asserted in Clark's petition. In sum, the magistrate judge held that Clark's claims were either procedurally barred, fully and fairly litigated in state court, or without merit. Having reviewed the record, we affirm the district court substantially for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

/972/f2d/353 · .json · Public domain