Young v. Central Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis
972 F.2d 536 · 1992
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2015
5 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Vaughn v. Rosen · Jones v. Nor-Tex Agencies, Inc. · Barney v. Internal Revenue Service · Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. v. Colby · Spannaus v. U.S. Department of Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n agency does not waive FOIA exemptions by not raising them during the administrative process. . . . [W]aiver is inappropriate because [inter alia] FOIA provides for de novo judicial review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.