Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 972 F.2d 700 - Howing Company

Howing Company’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2025

2 district ·

101990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. · Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation · Armstrong v. Marathon Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where there has been a finding of materiality, a shareholder has made a sufficient showing of causal relationship between the violation and the injury for which he seeks redress if, as here, he proves that the proxy solicitation itself, rather than the particular defect in the solicitation materials, was an essential link in the accomplishment of the transaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.