Hendricks-Robinson v. Excel Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · School Board of Nassau County Florida v. H Arline · White v. York International Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not only violates the spirit of the ADA but discourages employers from assisting disabled employees beyond the requirements of the ADA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To penalize Excel for not automatically bidding permanently restricted employees on all nonproduction jobs,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was not required to make those positions permanent as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.