State v. Talbot’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2012
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Rimmasch · State v. Anderson · State v. Pledger · Cruz v. Montoya · State v. Jaeger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Mjagistrates must leave all the weighing of credible but conflicting evidence to the trier of fact and must 'view the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution[,] re-soly[ing] all inferences in favor of the prosecution.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“'unless the evidence is wholly lacking and incapable of reasonable inference to prove some issue which supports the [prosecution's] claim,' the magistrate should bind the defendant over for trial”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Com. v. Jackson · State v. Bradshaw“[The magistrate's evaluation of credibility at a preliminary hearing is limited to determining that evidence is wholly lacking and incapable of reasonable inference to prove some issue which supports the [prosecution's] claim.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.