State v. Roman’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 107 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Pacheco · 121 Wash. 2d 852 - State v. Anderson · 94 Wash. 2d 690 - State v. Carpenter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant should have the burden of proving amenability, for he or she knows what he or she was doing during the relevant period; the State should have the burden of proving due diligence, for it knows what it was doing during the relevant period.[ 20 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“time during which a defendant is detained in jail or prison outside the state of Washington,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Galbreath
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.