Jenkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Batson v. Kentucky · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Penson v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"At trial, the State's evidence tended to show that on April 21, 1989, a truck driver discovered Tammy Hogeland's nude body on the side of a highway near Birmingham, Alabama. Forensic tests showed that Hogeland died as a result of manual strangulation. Hogeland was last seen on April 18, 1989, at the Tenth Avenue Omelet Shoppe restaurant in Birmingham were she was working as a waitress. Some of the jewelry Hogeland had been wearing when she was last seen was missing when her body was discovered. "At about 2:00 a.m. on April 18, 1989, a witness saw a red sports car, driven by Jenkins, enter the parking lot of the Omelet Shoppe. Sara Harris, an employee of the Omelet Shoppe, testified that she saw the victim drive off with Jenkins. Later that morning two witnesses saw Jenkins at a gasoline service station off 1-59. They said that a female was also in the car and that she appeared to be `passed out.' These two witnesses left the service station and Jenkins also left the station and followed them on 1-59. They saw Jenkins pull off of 1-59 in an area near where Hogeland's body was later discovered."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no claim even remotely related to the venire members' failure to truthfully answer questions during voir dire examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“McMILLAN, P.J., and COBB, BASCHAB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Jenkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.