State v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · Swint v. Chambers County Commission · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson · State v. Jacobs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although intent to commit a burglary is a question of fact, it need not be proved as a fact. It may be inferred from the circumstances. State v. Robinson, 29,488 (La.App.2d Cir.6/18/97), 697 So.2d 607 , writ denied, 1997-1845 (La.12/12/97), 704 So.2d 1200 . A taking is not required. State v. Wright, 36,635 (La.App.2d Cir.3/7/03), 840 So.2d 1271 . Displacement of the victim’s possessions may be indicative of the specific intent to commit a theft. State v. Bell, [42,394 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/5/07), 972 So.2d 1207 ]; State v. Wright, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.