Sumrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Solem v. Helm · Harmelin v. Michigan · 604 So. 2d 280 - Fleming v. State · 731 So. 2d 1120 - Young v. State · Edwards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every person convicted in this state of a felony who shall have been convicted twice previously of any felony or federal crime upon charges separately brought and arising out of separate incidents at different times and who shall have been sentenced to and served separate terms of one (1) year or more in any state and/or federal penal institution, whether in this state or elsewhere, and where any one (1) of such felonies shall have been a crime of violence shall be sentenced to life imprisonment, and such sentence shall not be reduced or suspended nor shall such person be eligible for parole or probation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hile pro se litigants are afforded some leniency, they must be held to substantially the same standards of litigation conduct as members of the bar.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a threshold comparison of the crime committed to the sentence imposed leads to an inference of 'gross disproportionality.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.