State v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Richards v. Taylor · State v. Parrish
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a de novo review, “the parties are entitled to a reexamination of the whole matter of law and fact.” Richards v. Taylor, 926 S.W.2d 569, 570 (Tenn.App.1996). The circuit court is not concerned with what took place in the lower court; the matter is tried as if no other hearing had occurred. Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., 586 S.W.2d 117,119 (Tenn.App.1979). A de novo hearing encompasses more than just the presentation of proof. The court must try the matter and render judgment as if no judgment had previously been rendered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.