Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 A.2d 524 - State v. Manning

State v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Chambers v. Mississippi · California v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence of a complaining witness's similar accusations of wrongdoing against others may be used to challenge a witness's credibility with respect to the pending charges, regardless of whether those prior accusations ever were proved false.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'sufficient cross-examination to satisfy a defendant's constitutional confrontation rights,' the trial justice may exercise his sound discretion in limiting further cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is tempered by the dictates of practicality and judicial economy; trial justices are authorized to exercise sound discretion in limiting the scope of cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.