United States v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
973 F.2d 102 · 1992
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2013
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 856 (§ 416 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Atkinson · United States v. Abel · Foy v. Northeast Suburban Life
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] ruling of reversible error must follow unless we conclude there existed no reasonable possibility of prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a manner inconsistent with fairness and integrity of judicial proceedings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“No 'serious injustice was inflicted upon ... defendant'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.