Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 F.2d 1152 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

973 F.2d 1152 · 1992

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Pofahl (1993), United States v. Laury (1993)

37 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

3001992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Jones v. United States · Texas v. Brown · Williams v. United States · New York v. Burger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Administrative searches conducted pursuant to valid statutory schemes do not violate the Constitution simply because of the existence of a specific suspicion of wrongdoing.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Since [the] criminal instruments were not found at Thomas's ... business, the expectation of finding the [criminal instruments] at Thomas's home was a reasonable inference supporting a determination of probable cause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that because the Customs officers were accompanied by a Louisiana State Policeman, and were following an informant's tip that a vessel in the ship channel was thought to be carrying marijuana,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.