Self v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
973 F.2d 1198 · 1992
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably State v. Correa (1997), United States v. Garcia Abrego (1998)
34 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Johnson v. Zerbst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment [prohibits] states from securing criminal convictions through the use of involuntary confessions resulting from coercive police conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When ... a trial court fails to render express findings on credibility but makes a ruling that depends upon an implicit determination that credits one witness’s testimony as being truthful, or implicitly discredits another’s, such determinations are entitled to the same presumption of correctness that they would have been accorded had they been made explicitly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“In addition to the due process prohibition against the use of coerced confessions, the now-familiar procedural safeguards established in [ Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)] also protect an accused's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination during custodial interrogation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gachot v. Stalder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.