Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 F.2d 1379 - Gainor v. Rogers

Gainor v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

973 F.2d 1379 · 1992

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
7
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 11 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Albright v. Rodriguez (1995), Ashton v. Brown (1995)

24 federal appellate · 11 district · 12 state decisions

3901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The cases are legion in this and other circuits which establish that where there are genuine issues of material fact surrounding an arrestee's conduct it is impossible for the court to determine, as a matter of law, what predicate facts exist to decide whether or not the officer's conduct clearly violated established law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This [qualified immunity analysis] allows ample room for a good faith mistake by the officer since his conduct must be measured in terms of the belief of a reasonable officer based upon the facts then available to the officer”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is fundamental that an arrest violates the Fourth Amendment when there exists no reasonable suspicion or probable cause that an individual is engaged in criminal activity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.