Davidson’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Tregenza v. Great American Communications Co. (1993), Republic Panama v. Bcci Holdings Sa Sa Na
7 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Kennedy v. Josephthal & Co. · Cook v. Avien, Inc. · Zobrist v. Coal-X, Inc. · DeBruyne v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) the sophistication and expertise of the plaintiff in financial ... matters; (2) the existence of long-standing business or personal relationships; (3) access to the relevant information; (4) the existence of a fiduciary relationship; (5) concealment of the fraud; (6) the opportunity to detect the fraud; (7) whether the plaintiff initiated the ... transaction or sought to expedite the transaction; and (8) the generality or specificity of the misrepresentations.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because the timeliness requirement is substantive, a plaintiff must affirmatively plead facts indicating the action has been timely brought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Court must determine whether the plaintiff possessed such knowledge as would alert a reasonable investor to the possibility of fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.