Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 F.2d 39 - Buenrostro v. Collazo

Buenrostro v. Collazo’s Empirical Analysis

973 F.2d 39 · 1992

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 21 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Lee v. City of Los Angeles (2001), Martinez v. Colon (1995)

49 federal appellate · 21 district · 1 state decisions

5901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Payton v. New York · Monroe v. Pape

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the law strives to balance its desire to compensate those whose rights are infringed by state actors with an equally compelling desire to shield public servants from undue interference with the performance of their duties and from threats of liability which, though unfounded, may nevertheless be unbearably disruptive.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'Supreme Court has made it crystal clear that principles of causation borrowed from tort law are relevant to civil rights actions brought under section 1983.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Hence, state officials exercising discretionary authority are entitled to qualified immunity insofar as their conduct does not transgress clearly established constitutional or federal statutory rights of which a reasonably prudent official should have been aware.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.