United States v. Stein’s Empirical Analysis
973 F.2d 600 · 1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)
Relies on Kuntz v. City of Dayton · United States v. Connell · United States v. Lenfesty · United States v. Stuart · United States v. Barth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“outrageous official conduct [overcame his] will”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“predisposed only to dealing in small quantities”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.